Appeal No. 2001-1795
Application 08/825,196
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1, 15, 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Burbo in view
of Vansaghi and Funathu.
2. Claims 2 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Burbo in view of
Vansaghi and Funathu, and further in view of the admitted prior
art.
3. Claims 3, 16 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Burbo in view
of Vansaghi and Funathu, and further in view of the admitted
prior art and Frantz.
4. Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Burbo in view of Vansaghi and
Funathu, and further in view of Moore.
5. Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Burbo in view of the
admitted prior art, Vansaghi and Frantz.
6. Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Burbo in view of the
admitted prior art, Vansaghi and Frantz, and further in view of
Moore.
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007