The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 41 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HARUO YOSHII, MITSURU NAIKI, and YURIKO FUKATA __________ Appeal No. 2001-1907 Application No. 08/694,315 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTER, ADAMS, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL An oral hearing in this case was scheduled for November 21, 2002. Upon reviewing the case, however, we have determined that an oral hearing will not be necessary and we render the following decision based on the record. See 37 CFR § 1.194(c). This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5-16, 18-23 and 25-27. Claims 1, 15 and 23 are representative of the subject matter on appeal, and read as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007