Appeal No. 2001-1907 Page 3 Application No. 08/694,315 Wood et al. (Wood), ”Proteins in Solution and Enzyme Mechanisms,” Biochemistry A Problems Approach, 2nd edition, pp. 126-172 (1981) Takashi et al. (Takashi), ”Basic studies on nebulizer therapy with histaglobin, Systemic effects and histological findings of nasal and tracheal mucosa in guinea pigs exposed to histamine-added guinea pig gamma-globulin,” Chemical Abstracts, Vol. 112, p. 50, Abstracts No. 112:111828b (1990) Fahey et al. (Fahey), ”Immune-based therapies in HIV infection,” Clin. Exp. Immunol., Vol. 89, pp. 3-5 (1992) Buckley, “Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases,” Fundamental Immunology, 3rd Edition, Chp. 38, pp. 1354-1368 (1993) Yoshii, (Yosshii II), “Arerugi,” Japanese Journal of Allergology, Vol. 44, Issue 5, pp. 567-570 (1995) Naiki et al. (Naiki), ”Rat g-Globulin/Histamine inhibits Experimental Allergic Encephaomyelitis (EAE) in Lewis Rats,” Cong. Immun., 9th Inter., Abstract 1084 (1995) Claims 23, 26 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, on the grounds that the specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the invention commensurate in scope with the claims. Claims 1-2, 5-16, 18-23 and 25-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being rendered obvious by the combination of Yoshii I, Yoshii II, Naiki, Getlik, Takashi, McMichael and Wood. In addition, claims 23, 26 and 27 stand rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting over the combination of claims 1-11 of U.S. Patent No. 5,780,026, McMichael and Wood. After careful review of the record and consideration of the issues before us, we reverse all of the rejections of record.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007