Ex Parte GOLDSCHMIDT IKI et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           


                                                       Paper No. 23                   


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      

                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                             Ex parte JEAN M. GOLDSCHMIDT,                            
                               ANTHONY A. SHAH-NAZAROFF,                              
                                CHRISTOPHER D. WILLIAMS                               
                                   and KATHLEEN LANE                                  
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 2001-2003                               
                              Application 08/939,185                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   

          Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's              
          final rejection of claims 43-48 and 55-90.  Representative                  
          claim 43 is reproduced below:                                               



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007