The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte JEAN M. GOLDSCHMIDT, ANTHONY A. SHAH-NAZAROFF, CHRISTOPHER D. WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN LANE ______________ Appeal No. 2001-2003 Application 08/939,185 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims 43-48 and 55-90. Representative claim 43 is reproduced below: 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007