Ex Parte CHEN et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2001-2146                                                                                                 
               Application No. 09/270,588                                                                                           

                       photoexposing the processed patterned positive photoresist layer to form a                                   
               photoexposed processed patterned positive photoresist layer with enhanced solubility of the                          
               photoexposed processed patterned positive photoresist layer within a solvent; and                                    
                       stripping from the processed target layer the photoexposed processed patterned                               
               positive photoresist layer while employing the solvent.                                                              

                                               THE REFERENCES OF RECORD                                                             
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following references:                                       
               Wright et al. (Wright)                         3,664,899                      May  23, 1972                          
               Liao et al. (Liao)                             4,645,562                      Feb.  24, 1987                         
               Miyashita et al. (Miyashita)                   5,380,608                      Jan.  10, 1995                         
               Sato et al. (Sato)                             5,994,007                      Nov. 30, 1999                          

                                                                                                                                   
                                                       THE REJECTIONS                                                               
               Claims 1 through 7, 9 through 14, 16 through 26, 28 through 30 and 33 through                                        
               36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable over Liao in view of                                 
               Wright and Miyashita.1                                                                                               
               Claims 8, 15 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable                                     
               over Lao in view of Wright and Machete and further in view of Sat.                                                   






                       1Claims 31 and 32 have been cancelled.                                                                       
                                                                 3                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007