Ex Parte HARTMAN et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2001-2241                                                                              
            Application No. 08/928,555                                                                        


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   Appellants’ invention relates to a method and system for displaying and editing of         
            information.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of                  
            exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                     
                   1.    A method for displaying a form at a client system, the method                        
                   comprising:                                                                                
                         providing a document describing the form, the form having a                          
                   plurality of sections, each section having descriptive information and a                   
                   plurality of data entry fields;                                                            
                         displaying the descriptive information for each section;                             
                         in response to a user selecting descriptive information of a section,                
                   expanding that section by displaying the data entry fields associated with                 
                   that section; and                                                                          
                         when the user indicates to collapse the expanded section,                            
                   collapsing that section by removing the displayed data entry field and                     
                   redisplaying the descriptive information for that section.                                 
                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the            
            appealed claims are:                                                                              
            Wright, Jr. (Wright)             5,704,029                       Dec. 30, 1997                    
                                                                       (Filed May 23, 1994)                   
            Bertram et al. (Bertram)         5,805,159                       Sep. 8, 1998                     
                                                                       (Filed Aug. 22, 1996)                  
            Microsoft Project for Windows Feature Guide Business Project Planning System,                     
            Version 1, Windows Series, Microsoft Corporation, Chapter 2; Managing a Project,                  
            pages 54 and 55 (Copyright 1990) (Microsoft).                                                     



                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007