Ex Parte KOMAI - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2001-2286                                                        
          Application 09/022,193                                                      


          sales information registered by the registration means is                   
          supplied to the second sub-portion for storing sales information            
          of respective special purchasers, and                                       
               wherein the sales information stored in the first and second           
          sub-portions includes a total quantity and a total price for at             
          least one item,                                                             
               thereby allowing the total quantity and the total price of             
          the at least one item purchased by both ordinary and special                
          purchasers to be output from said respective first and second               
          sub-portions of said information storage means.                             
                                   References                                         
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:               
          Suzuki                        5,053,957      Oct.  1, 1991                  
          Francisco et al. (Francisco) 5,799,283       Aug. 25, 1998                  
          (filed May 10, 1995)                                                        
                              Rejection at Issue                                      
               Claims 1 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          being unpatentable over Suzuki in view of Francisco.                        
               Rather than repeat the arguments of the Appellant or the               
          Examiner, we make reference to the briefs1 and answer for the               
          respective details thereof.                                                 




               1 Appellant filed an appeal brief on February 27, 2001.  The           
          Examiner in response mailed an Examiner’s Answer on May 7, 2001.            
          Appellant filed a reply brief on July 6, 2001. The Examiner                 
          mailed an office communication on July 17, 2001, stating that the           
          reply brief has been entered.                                               
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007