Appeal No. 2001-2286
Application 09/022,193
must also explain the reasoning by which the findings are deemed
to support the agency’s conclusion.” Lee, 277 F.3d at 1344, 61
USPQ2d at 1434.
We fail to find that the Examiner has provided the requisite
findings based on evidence of the record to support that the
Appellant’s claims 1 through 7 are properly rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103. In particular, we fail to find that neither
Suzuki nor Francisco or the combination thereof teaches or
suggests a means for executing a special registration mode in
which the registered sales information is stored in a second sub-
portion for special purchasers or that the sales information
storage means includes total quantity and total price for each
item sold.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007