Appeal No. 2001-2369
Application 08/728,422
personality server. The examiner finds that it would have been
obvious to the artisan to have provided the network oriented
system of Yu with the OS translation system of Loucks to provide
a highly adaptable system [answer, pages 3-5].
Appellants argue that none of the components of Yu
identified by the examiner teaches the claimed emulation library
because each of these components handles both network and non-
network commands. Appellants also argue that the Telnet Server
as identified by the examiner cannot be the network since it does
not receive all the commands requiring network services.
Appellants argue that any inherent non-network server in Yu does
not teach that the server is separate from the emulation library
and performs the claimed functions. Appellants note that Loucks
does not provide the missing teachings and, in fact, teaches away
from using emulation libraries. Appellant also argues that
Loucks separates commands by personality rather than by whether
the commands require network services [brief, pages 4-9].
The examiner responds that the claimed emulation library
also handles both network and non-network commands. The examiner
also responds that the Telnet Server is a network server as long
as it receives at least one network command. The examiner also
asserts that any file server on the system could be the claimed
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007