Ex Parte GAASBECK et al - Page 9

          Appeal No. 2001-2369                                                        
          Application 08/728,422                                                      


          In summary, since the rejection fails to account for all                    
          the recitations of the claimed invention, we have not sustained             
          the examiner’s rejection of the claims on appeal.  Therefore, the           
          decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-6 is reversed.                  
          REVERSED                                                                    




                         JERRY SMITH                   )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         LANCE LEONARD BARRY           )  BOARD OF PATENT             
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )  APPEALS AND                 
                                                      )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                      )                              
                                                      )                              
                         STUART S. LEVY                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              






          js/ki                                                                       






                                         -9-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007