Appeal No. 2001-2401
Application 08/277,225
deficiencies of the primary combination of references. The rejections of the claims for
obviousness are reversed.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being
indefinite, is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1-5, 8-14, 16-21 and 23-25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
obvious over Pollema in view of Friguet and Woods; and the rejection of claims 6-7, 22
and 25 as obvious over Pollema in view of Friguet and Woods, in further view of
Freytag are reversed.
REVERSED
WILLIAM F. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
TONI R. SCHEINER )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
DEMETRA J. MILLS )
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007