The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RAHUL RAZDAN, JAMES B. KELLER, and RICHARD E. KESSLER ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2477 Application No. 09/099,384 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4 through 24. The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus for maintaining cache coherence in a multiprocessor system that has a plurality of cache and a main memory.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007