Ex Parte DEBOER et al - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2001-2540                                                        
          Application No. 09/240,395                                                  


               However, as pointed out by appellants, the disclosed                   
          function of the diffusion barrier layer 16 in Lur is “to minimize           
          the diffusion of fluorine atoms from the tungsten silicide to the           
          gate oxide layer” [column 2, lines 50-51].  Yet, Thomas                     
          specifically discloses, at column 7, lines 42-45, that the                  
          “barrier metal layer is then dry etched with a fluorine or                  
          chloride based plasma which selectively attacks the barrier layer           
          material.”                                                                  
               If Lur seeks to minimize the diffusion of fluorine atoms,              
          then it seems reasonable to us that the artisan would not employ            
          a material in Lur that is taught to be etchable with a fluorine             
          based plasma, i.e., a material that is to act as a barrier for a            
          particular thing should not, reasonably, be etchable by that                
          thing since etchability implies a poor barrier.  Now, it may be             
          that the fluorine etch in an uncontrolled environment will etch             
          entirely through the “barrier” layer in which case it appears               
          clear that this layer is not a barrier to fluorine.  But Lur                
          wants to minimize the diffusion of fluorine.  Accordingly, it               







                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007