Ex Parte COOK et al - Page 3


                 Appeal No. 2001-2643                                                         Page 3                    
                 Application No. 08/117,363                                                                             

                                                      Discussion                                                        
                        The claims are directed to nucleosides, and compounds comprising them,                          
                 which are modified to have a terminal amine substituent in the 2’-O-, 3’-O-, or                        
                 5’-O-position, where the substituent is defined by a chemical formula.  See, e.g.,                     
                 claim 1.  The claimed products can also comprise moieties such as “a steroid                           
                 molecule, a reporter molecule, a lipophilic molecule, a reporter enzyme, a                             
                 peptide, [or] a protein.”  Claim 1.  The specification discloses that the claimed                      
                 products are useful in, among other things, antisense methodologies.  See pages                        
                 7 and 9.                                                                                               
                        The examiner rejected all of the claims as obvious in view of Urdea,                            
                 Carrico, Matteucci, and Latham, either alone or in combination with “applicants[’]                     
                 admissions.”1  The examiner reasoned as follows:                                                       
                        Urdea et al. teaches a 5’-O-position having an R1 substituent (see                              
                        Urdea bottom of col[.] 10).  Matteucci discloses the claimed                                    
                        “O-C-N” chain (see Matteucci p. 16 lines 30-35) as well as                                      
                        numerous other internucleotide linkages (see Matteucci page 13,                                 
                        line 2 to page 20 line 30, for example).                                                        
                        The claims differ from Matteucci in the recitation of terminal                                  
                        linkages.  Latham teaches that internucleotide linkages and                                     
                        terminal linkages are art recognized alternatives (see for example                              
                        Latham page 18, lines 3-17).  Latham also teaches the attachment                                
                        of linkages at the 2’ position of the sugar.                                                    
                        It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in                              
                        the art at the time the invention was made to combine the prior art                             
                        teachings [of] nucleotide linkages because, lacking a showing of                                
                        criticality, or other secondary consideration, the claimed alkyl chain                          
                        is considered one of several alternative linkages, any one of which                             
                        the art skilled [worker] would reasonably expect to function in the                             
                                                                                                                        
                 1 The examiner relied on Appellants’ “admissions” only to meet the specific limitation of claims 5     
                 and 19.  The basic rationale of both rejections was the same.  See the Examiner’s Answer, pages        
                 4-5.                                                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007