Ex Parte COOK et al - Page 7


                 Appeal No. 2001-2643                                                         Page 7                    
                 Application No. 08/117,363                                                                             

                 1A.  Matteucci describes this compound as “a 5-deoxy, 5’-amino, 3’-protected                           
                 nucleoside, which can be selected from a range of known compounds.”  Page                              
                 28, lines 8-10.                                                                                        
                        The instant application claims priority through a series of continuations-in-                   
                 part, to application 07/566,977 (filed August 13, 1990).  Matteucci was published                      
                 April 2, 1992.  In disputing the examiner’s rejections, however, Appellants have                       
                 not argued that Matteucci is not prior art with respect to the instant claims.  Thus,                  
                 Matteucci seems to indicate that the compound of at least claim 16 was known in                        
                 the art prior to its effective filing date.  Upon return of this application, the                      
                 examiner should consider whether Matteucci’s disclosure anticipates or renders                         
                 obvious claim 16 or the claims dependent thereon.                                                      
                 2.  Inventorship                                                                                       
                        A petition was filed under 37 CFR 1.48(a) to correct the inventorship of the                    
                 instant application by adding Charles J. Guinosso to the named inventors.  See                         
                 Paper No. 29, filed January 7, 1998.  The examiner indicated that the petition                         
                 had been granted and that “[t]he new inventor, Charles J. Guinosso, will be                            
                 added to the file label immediately following the mailing of [Paper No. 31].”  See                     
                 Paper No. 31, mailed April 2, 1998.                                                                    
                        The inventorship has not yet been changed on the face of the file or in the                     
                 USPTO’s computer database.  Upon return of this application, the examiner                              
                 should ensure that its inventorship accurately reflects the change requested in                        
                 the granted petition.                                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007