Ex Parte KOROISHI et al - Page 2


         Appeal No. 2001-2673                                                       
         Application No. 09/299,470                                 Page 2          


                                     BACKGROUND                                     
              Appellants' invention relates to a piezoelectric actuator             
         and a method of compensating the orientation thereof.  An                  
         understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of            
         exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:                         
                   1. A piezoelectric actuator comprising:                          
                   a piezoelectric element;                                         
                   an electrode pattern formed on the piezoelectric                 
              element; and                                                          
                   at least one identifying marking formed on the                   
              electrode pattern, each of the at least one identifying               
              markings having a shape comprising multiple straight                  
              sides so misalignment during formation of the electrode               
              pattern on the piezoelectric element whereby a portion                
              of an identifying marking is not formed on the                        
              electrode pattern results in a linear variation in area               
              of the identifying marking and not a variation in area                
              of the identifying marking based on a squared value of                
              a dimension thereof;                                                  
                   and wherein the at least one identifying marking                 
              is formed at a specific location of the electrode                     
              pattern for use in identifying a characteristic of the                
              electrode pattern.                                                    
              The examiner relies upon appellants’ admitted prior art               
         disclosed in figure 17 of appellants’ specification.                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007