Ex Parte GAREY - Page 8




                 Appeal No. 2002-0076                                                                                  Page 8                     
                 Application No. 09/144,842                                                                                                       


                         Ford's shower speaker telephone system 10 further "comprises a portable                                                  
                 cordless shower speaker telephone 12 providing a light weight waterproof                                                         
                 handset 14. . . ."  Col. 4, ll. 25-27.  The portable handset is "a hands-free                                                    
                 speakerphone. . . ."  Abs., l. 1.  We find that the portable handset, which can be used                                          
                 remotely from the base unit, includes a microphone, viz., "an amplified microphone 76."                                          
                 Col. 5, l. 24.                                                                                                                   


                                                              Additions of Ford                                                                   
                         The examiner finds, "Ford discloses a cordless telephone including a                                                     
                 speakerphone coupled to a network comprising a base unit (150) having a connection                                               
                 to the telephone line (reads on network connection) of a user's home, office, etc., . . .                                        
                 and telephone circuitry (164) including a transmitting and receiving circuitry."  (Final                                         
                 Rejection at 2.)  The appellant argues, "[t]he telephone circuitry 164 of Ford includes                                          
                 both transmitting circuitry and receiving circuitry.  Ford fails to disclose any                                                 
                 modifications to this circuitry whereby the transmitting circuitry does not operate.  Thus,                                      
                 Ford requires an additional element which the invention of claim 1 does not."  (Appeal                                           
                 Br. at 9.)  He further argues, "[l]ikewise, the invention of claim 1 does not require echo                                       
                 cancelers, which would be required by Ford. . . ."  (Id.)                                                                        











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007