Ex Parte GAREY - Page 13




                 Appeal No. 2002-0076                                                                                 Page 13                     
                 Application No. 09/144,842                                                                                                       


                 combine flows from the references themselves.  Therefore, we affirm the obviousness                                              
                 rejection of claim 1 and of claims  2-4, 12, and 13, which fall therewith.                                                       


                                                               CONCLUSION                                                                         
                         In summary, the rejection of claims 1-4, 12, and 13 under § 103(a) is affirmed.                                          
                 "Any arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused consideration by                                         
                 the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. . . ."  37 C.F.R. § 1.192(a).                                                     
                 Accordingly, our affirmance is based only on the arguments made in the briefs.  Any                                              
                 arguments or authorities not included therein are neither before us nor at issue but are                                         
                 considered waived.  No time for taking any action connected with this appeal may be                                              
                 extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).                                                                                             























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007