Ex Parte LESIEUR - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2002-0218                                                        
          Application No. 09/332,415                                                  

               13.  The autothermal reformer assembly of Claim                        
               1 wherein said foam catalyst bed includes an autothermal               
               reformer-operating temperature-compatible metal support                
               selected from the group consisting of stainless steel,                 
               nickel alloys and iron-aluminum alloys.                                
               18.  The autothermal reformer assembly of Claim                        
               1 wherein said air inlet passage contains an air/steam                 
               mixture.                                                               
               23.  A methanol fuel gas autothermal reformer assembly                 
               for converting a methanol fuel gas stream into a                       
               hydrogen-enriched process gas stream, said assembly                    
               comprising a monolithic open cell foam catalyst bed,                   
               said catalyst bed including an inlet end and an outlet                 
               end, an inlet portion of said catalyst bed being                       
               provided with a noble metal catalyst which is operable                 
               to combust a portion of the methanol fuel gas at a                     
               temperature of about 200/F thereby enabling start up                   
               of the reformer assembly while inhibiting carbon                       
               deposition in catalyzed cells of said foam catalyst                    
               bed.                                                                   

                                      PRIOR ART                                       
               In rejecting the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner            
          relies upon the following prior art references:                             
          Dicks                         3,904,554           Sep. 09, 1975             
          Narumiya et al. (Narumiya)    4,308,233           Dec. 29, 1981             
          Setzer et al. (Setzer)        4,415,484           Nov. 15, 1983             
          Sheller                       5,384,009           Jan. 24, 1995             
          Bhattacharyya et al. (Bhatta)  5,498,370          Mar. 12, 1996             
          Clawson                  WO 98/08771         Mar. 05, 1998                  
          (Published World Intell. Prop. Org. Application)                            





                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007