Appeal No. 2002-0218 Application No. 09/332,415 Given the desire of one of ordinary skill in the art to reduce the size and weight of an autothermal reformer assembly, we concur with the examiner that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to employ the open cell foam catalyst carrier taught in Narumiya as the carrier for the reforming catalyst of the autothermal reformer assembly described in Clawson, motivated by a reasonable expectation of successfully reducing the size and weight of the assembly and enhancing the heat transfer, gas mixing and distribution, and gas conversion during the autothermal reforming process. See, e.g., Nomiya, 509 F.2d at 572, 184 USPQ at 613 (“that knowledge of a problem provides a reason or motivation for workers in the art . . . ”). In reaching this determination, we recognize that Narumiya is directed to employing its open cell foam catalyst carrier in a purification device, rather than in a reforming zone of an autothermal reformer assembly, as argued by the appellant. However, as indicated supra, the appellant acknowledges that it is known to be desirable in the autothermal reforming art to reduce the size and weight of an autothermal reformer assembly via selecting particular catalyst shapes and/or configurations. We find that Narumiya is also interested in decreasing the size and the weight of a purification device by employing a 11Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007