Appeal No. 2002-0230 Application No. 09/136,070 second rationale notwithstanding their clear opportunity to do so in filing their previously mentioned reply brief. Because the appellants themselves have not even alleged the presence of error in the examiner’s second rationale, it is inappropriate for the majority to consider this rationale as failing to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. For the reasons set forth above and in the answer, I believe the examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103 -12-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007