Ex Parte MIYAKE et al - Page 12




            Appeal No. 2002-0230                                                                            
            Application No. 09/136,070                                                                      

             second rationale notwithstanding their clear opportunity to do so in filing their              
             previously mentioned reply brief.  Because the appellants themselves have not even             
             alleged the presence of error in the examiner’s second rationale, it is inappropriate for      
             the majority to consider this rationale as failing to establish a prima facie case of          
             obviousness.                                                                                   
                   For the reasons set forth above and in the answer, I believe the examiner has            
             established a prima facie case of obviousness within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103            






















                                                    -12-                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007