Ex Parte APPELMAN - Page 9




            Appeal No. 2002-0366                                                   Page 9              
            Application No. 08/803,692                                                                 


            know that the user was logged in before logging out.  In                                   
            addition, the monitoring of the keyboard, mouse, etc. are                                  
            indicative of whether or not the user is logged onto the                                   
            computer.  Thus, we find that in addition to determining log-on                            
            and log-off of the computer, Tang'365 discloses additional                                 
            monitoring of the activity of the user.  Accordingly, we find                              
            that Tang'365 discloses displaying in the gallery window                                   
            information indicative of the currently logged-on co-subscribers                           
            among those in the predefined personal directory, and indicates a                          
            change in log-on status of at least one of the co-subscribers in                           
            the predefined personal directory, as recited in claim 21.                                 
            However, Tang'365 does not disclose playing a sound to indicate                            
            the change in log-on status, such as logging off from the user's                           
            or worker's computer.  However, Tang'173 discloses that in                                 
            addition to a visual indication, an aural indication be provided                           
            (col. 4, lines 31-35, and 61 and 62).  From the disclosure of                              
            Tang'173 of providing an aural indication and the disclsoure of                            
            Tang'365 of incorporating the disclosure of Tang'173 by reference                          
            (col. 1, lines 7-12), we find that an artisan would have been                              
            motivated to provide aural indications in the system of Tang'365.                          
            Accordingly, we find that the teachings of Tang'365 and Tang'173                           
            would have suggested the limitations of claim 21.  The rejection                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007