The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 49 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte GARY R. GROTENDORST, and NAOKO IIDA __________ Appeal No. 2002-0427 Application No. 08/179,656 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before MILLS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, and 23-26. Claim 6 is also pending and the examiner has indicated that it is allowable. See Paper No. 33, mailed July 13, 1999. Claim 1 is representative of the claims on appeal and reads as follows: 1. A purified protein consisting of Leukocyte Derived Growth Factor 2 (LDGF2) having immunoreactivity and an amino acid sequence which differs from the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 17 by an amino acid(s) substitution, deletion, or insertion which does not affect the reactivity of the protein.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007