Ex Parte STEINER et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                            Paper No. 21             
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                 Ex parte J.P. STEINER and DANIEL J. ROCKWELL                                        
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                Appeal No. 2002-0496                                                 
                                              Application No. 09/182,542                                             
                                                    ____________                                                     
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                     
             Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    A patent examiner rejected claims 1-36.  The appellants appeal therefrom under                   
             35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We affirm-in-part.                                                                 


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The invention at issue on appeal locates faults in an underground residential                    
             (power) distribution ("URD") system.  A typical URD system is configured as a loop with                 
             an open point along it.  Sections of cables connect transformers that supply power to                   
             customers.  The system is fed from both ends of the loop via overhead power lines.                      
             Because of the open point, each half of the loop is fed independently.  (Spec. at 1.)                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007