Appeal No. 2002-0496 Page 9
Application No. 09/182,542
distribution loop of a URD system without undue experimentation. Therefore, we affirm
the non-enablement rejection of claim 16.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-15 and 17-36 under § 112, ¶ 1, is
reversed. The rejection of claim 16 under § 112, ¶ 1, however, is affirmed. "Any
arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused consideration by the
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. . . ." 37 C.F.R. § 1.192(a). Accordingly,
our affirmance is based only on the arguments made in the briefs. Any arguments or
authorities not included therein are neither before us nor at issue but are considered
waived. No time for taking any action connected with this appeal may be extended
under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007