Ex Parte CAVIGELLI - Page 6




                 Appeal No. 2002-0558                                                                                  Page 6                     
                 Application No. 09/289,076                                                                                                       


                 conductive element 30 which provides a ground path for the insulation charging                                                   
                 current 32."  Col. 6, ll. 5-8.                                                                                                   


                         Meyer's device also includes an amplifier.  Specifically, "coil assembly 34 is                                           
                 electrically connected to a sensor electronic circuit or transmitter 38. . . .  The                                              
                 transmitter 38 performs the functions of amplifying and rectifying the sensor voltage                                            
                 signal Vs."  Id. at ll. 25-29 (emphasis added).  Furthermore, we find that the transmitter,                                      
                 which operates as an amplifier inter alia, generates a signal proportional to the leakage                                        
                 current.  Specifically, "[o]utput driver circuits in the transmitter 38 are used to modulate                                     
                 a DC current I1 in a control loop 40. The modulation results in the current signal I1                                            
                 containing a proportionate magnitude of the charging current 32."  Id. at ll. 29-33                                              
                 (emphasis added).                                                                                                                


                         Second, the appellant argues, "[t]here is no disclosure of coil 34 having a                                              
                 secondary resistance."  (Appeal Br. at 5.)  The examiner asserts, "[a] secondary                                                 
                 winding having a resistance is an inherent property of a winding."                                                               


                         Claim 1 specifies in pertinent part the following limitations: "a secondary winding,                                     
                 the secondary winding having a secondary resistance. . . ."  Giving the claim its                                                









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007