Ex Parte PARK - Page 1






           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 25         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte GEUN-WOO PARK                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2002-0587                                 
                              Application No. 08/922,300                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: February 11, 2003                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before THOMAS, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          examiner's final rejection of claims 1-11, which are all of the             
          claims pending in this application.                                         


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant's invention relates to a display device with a               
          power interrupt delay function.  An understanding of the                    
          invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,               
          which is reproduced as follows:                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007