Appeal No. 2002-0587 Page 9 Application No. 08/922,300 enough rate so that transistor 58 will be turned on to cause the beam to be horizontally deflected off the screen.” From the disclosure of Martin that voltages +V4 and +V5 will decay off at a slow enough rate so that transistor 58 will be turned on to cause the beam to be deflected off of the screen if the power supply fails, we find that Martin teaches gradually lowering the input voltages +V4 and +V5 to the deflection yoke when the power supply to the display device is interrupted. Although we agree with appellant (brief, page 8) that modifying the admitted prior art by slowly dropping the voltage at the control grid as taught by Martin would only result in slowly dropping the voltage at the control grid in the admitted prior art, we find that Martin's additional teaching of slowly decaying the voltage to the horizontal deflection yoke would have suggested to an artisan gradually dropping the voltage of the voltage source V1 of the horizontal/vertical constant voltage circuit of the admitted prior art. Accordingly, we do not agree with appellant's assertion (brief, page 8) that "Martin only teaches, slowly dropping the voltage at the control grid 14 of the monitor" (underlining added). With respect to appellant's assertion (reply brief, page 7) that the present invention is directed toward a display devicePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007