Appeal No. 2002-0647 Application No. 09/122,094 disclosed relationships with each other. Therefore, there is no reason to believe that the horizontal length of the head portion is drawn to scale relative to the space dx. Without a definite overlap between the head of the gate electrode and element 15 in Uenishi, the examiner cannot establish the claimed relative dimensions. Thus, the examiner fails to present a prima facie case of obviousness, and we cannot sustain the rejection of the claims. CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) )) BOARD OF PATENT ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) STUART S. LEVY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007