Ex Parte GRASER et al - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                     
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                                                             Paper No. 18              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                      
                         Ex parte THEODOR GRASER, OLAF JACH,                           
                           HANS-JORG RENZ, HARALD NEUMANN                              
                                    and ANTON HANS                                     
          ____________                                                                 
                                Appeal No. 2002-0706                                   
                               Application 09/194,7731                                 
          ____________                                                                 
                                      ON BRIEF                                         
                                   _______________                                     

          Before PAK, WARREN, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                            

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from              
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 13, 14 and 24.  Claims              
          15 through 23, the remaining claims in the above-identified                  
          application, were objected to, but were indicated to be allowable            


               1 Application for patent filed March 31, 1999.                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007