Ex Parte GRASER et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-0706                                                         
          Application No. 09/194,773                                                   


               13.  A method for manufacturing a sensing element for                   
          determining oxygen content in exhaust gases for an internal                  
          combustion engine, comprising the steps of:                                  
               blunting edges of a composite arrangement for use as the                
          sensing element to increase a thermal shock resistance of the                
          sensing element; and                                                         
               sintering the composite arrangement to yield the sensing                
          element, the composite arrangement including at least one ceramic            
          paste present in film form.                                                  

                                      PRIOR ART                                        
               The examiner relies on the following prior art references:              
                                                                                      
          Kurishita et al. (Kurishita) 5,144,249             Sep.  1, 1992             
          Nenadic et al. (Nenadic)      5,871,313            Feb. 16, 1999             
                                                   (Filed Mar. 14, 1997)               
                                                                                      
                                      REJECTION                                        
               Claims 13, 14 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Kurishita and                  
          Nenadic.                                                                     
                                                                                      






               2(...continued)                                                         
          subject to a common ground of rejection as representative of all             
          claims in that group and to decide the appeal of that rejection              
          based solely on the selected representative claim.”).                        
                                          3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007