The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DUANE KENNETH ZACHARIAS, YUNG HSIANG HUANG, and FRANK GERALD DRUECKE __________ Appeal No. 2002-0741 Application No. 08/935,348 __________ HEARD: NOVEMBER 6, 2002 __________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-20, all the claims currently pending in the application. According to appellants, the present application is a continuation-in-part of 08/659,858 filed by appellants on June 7, 1996, now U.S. Patent 6,213,993 B1. In a decision rendered January 31, 2000 in Appeal No. 1998-2834 in the parent ‘858 application, this merits panel affirmed-in-part rejections of thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007