Ex Parte ZACHARIAS et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2002-0741                                                       
         Application No. 08/935,348                                                 


         claims under appeal therein under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  The subject            
         matter of the appealed claims in the present application is                
         similar to the subject matter of the appealed claims in the prior          
         appeal.                                                                    
              As stated on page 1 of the specification, “[t]he present              
         invention relates to a disposable absorbent article having a               
         body-facing adhesive to be positioned against a wearer’s skin.             
         In one aspect, the invention relates to a catamenial device                
         having a supportive adhesive residing on the body-side surface of          
         the device.”                                                               
              The references cited in the final rejection are:                      
         Lichstein                    5,658,270              Aug. 19, 1997          
         Paul                         5,559,165              Sep. 24, 1996          
         Vukos                     GB 2 284 767 A            Jun. 12, 1995          
         (published Great Britain Patent Application)                               
         Zacharias et al.       WO 96/13238                  May   9, 1996          
         (published World Intell. Prop. Org. Application) (hereinafter              
         referred to as Zacharias PCT ‘238)                                         
              The following rejections are before us for review:1                   
              (a) claims 1-20, rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                
         paragraph, “as based on a disclosure which is not enabling”                

              1In the final rejection, claims 1-20 were also rejected               
         under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.  In that this rejection           
         was not included in the examiner’s answer, it is presumed to have          
         been withdrawn.  Ex parte Emm, 118 USPQ 180, 181 (Bd. App. 1957).          
                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007