The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PHILLIP D. COOK, PEI-PEI KUNG, and ANDREW M. KAWASAKI
___________
Appeal No. 2002-0795
Application No. 09/128,036
__________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before WALTZ, TIMM, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 8, which are the only claims
pending in this application.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 134.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
method of preparing a library of chemical compounds by providing
1An amendment dated Dec. 8, 2000, Paper No 12, subsequent to
the final rejection, was entered by the examiner as noted in the
Advisory Action dated Jan. 5, 2001, Paper No. 13.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007