Ex Parte SKINNER et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered                  
              today was not written for publication and is not                      
              binding precedent of the Board.                                       
                                                      Paper No. 45                  

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                  ________________                                  
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                  ________________                                  
                Ex parte JAMES SKINNER, JOHN S. THORN, CRAIG NORDBY                 
                            and JOSEPH G. MERCINKIEWICZ                             
                                  ________________                                  
                               Appeal No. 2002-0831                                 
                               Application 08/250,286                               
                                  ________________                                  
                               HEARD: APRIL 10, 2003                                
                                  ________________                                  
         Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                
         Judges.                                                                    
         JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
         This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                     
         from the examiner’s rejection of claims 35-39, 44, 45 and 47-58,           
         which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  An          
         amendment after final rejection was filed on November 28, 2000             
         but was denied entry by the examiner.                                      
         The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                           
         apparatus for controlling the operation of a dynamoelectric                

                                        -1-                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007