The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 45 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte JAMES SKINNER, JOHN S. THORN, CRAIG NORDBY and JOSEPH G. MERCINKIEWICZ ________________ Appeal No. 2002-0831 Application 08/250,286 ________________ HEARD: APRIL 10, 2003 ________________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 35-39, 44, 45 and 47-58, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. An amendment after final rejection was filed on November 28, 2000 but was denied entry by the examiner. The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for controlling the operation of a dynamoelectric -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007