Ex Parte SKINNER et al - Page 3




         Appeal No. 2002-0831                                                       
         Application 08/250,286                                                     


              a plurality of switches positionable in a plurality of                
         switch settings connected to said processor, wherein preselected           
         switch settings correspond to one of the appliance environments            
         such that a user positions said plurality of switches in a                 
         desired switch setting to select a corresponding appliance                 
         environment, said microcontroller being programmed to read the             
         switch setting and in response thereto, obtain the system                  
         operating characteristic information corresponding to the                  
         selected appliance environment from said second memory so as to            
         permit said system to be used in different appliance                       
         environments; and                                                          
              programming means operatively attachable to said processor            
         and removable therefrom for loading dynamoelectric machine                 
         information associated with said appliance environments into said          
         second memory to enable said drive apparatus to be altered for             
         use with a variety of dynamoelectric machines in different                 
         appliance environments.                                                    
         The examiner relies on the following references:                           
         Toyoshima et al. (Toyoshima)    Re. 34,286       June 22, 1993             
         The admitted prior art of appellants’ specification.                       
         Claims 35-39, 44, 45 and 47-58 stand rejected under 35                     
         U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing subject matter which          
         was not described in the specification in such a way as to                 
         reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the              
         inventors, at the time the application was filed, had possession           
         of the claimed invention.  Claims 35-39, 44, 45 and 47-58 also             
         stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness          
         the examiner offers Toyoshima and the admitted prior art.                  



                                        -3-                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007