The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 57
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TETSURO MOTOYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0867
Application No. 08/738,659
____________
HEARD: October 21, 2003
____________
Before BARRETT, LEVY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection
of claims 10, 12-19, 36, 38-44, 52-61, and 68-87, which are all the claims remaining in
the application.
We affirm-in-part, and enter a new ground of rejection in accordance with 37
CFR § 1.196(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007