Ex Parte Akamatsu et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication in a law journal                 
               and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                               Paper No. 19           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                    Ex parte TOSHIYA AKAMATSU, KAZUAKI KARASAWA,                      
                           TERU NAKANISHI and KOZO SHIMIZU                            
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2002-0899                                  
                             Application No. 09/609,652                               
                                                                                     
                                HEARD: MARCH 11, 2003                                 
                                                                                     

          Before RUGGIERO, DIXON and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of           
          claims 25 and 31.  Claims 1-24, 28, 32, 34, and 37 have been                
          canceled.  Claims 26, 27, 29, 30, 33, 35, and 36 have been                  
          allowed.  An amendment filed August 31, 2001, which canceled                
          claim 37, was approved for entry by the Examiner.                           

                                         -1–1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007