Ex Parte SCOTT et al - Page 7




                  Appeal No. 2002-0934                                                                                
                  Application No. 09/392,276                                                                          

                  applied prior art and that, therefore, the Examiner used impermissible hindsight in                 
                  rejecting the claims.  See W.L. Gore & Associates v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540,                  
                  1553, 220 USPQ 303, 312-13 (Fed. Cir. 1983); In re Rothermel, 276 F.2d 393, 396,                    
                  125 USPQ 328, 331 (CCPA 1960).  For the reasons stated above and in Appellants’                     
                  Briefs, we reverse the Examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                               

























                                                         -7-                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007