Ex Parte KIM - Page 12



          Appeal No. 2002-1006                                                        
          Application 09/132,351                                                      

          simple press of a button or a combination of buttons on their               
          telephone.                                                                  
              Sanders also teaches in column 7, lines 4 through 21, that             
          the present invention facilitates dispatch or group short message           
          service.  Upon receiving a call request and a short message, the            
          MSC 118 provides a call request and short message to the SMS                
          processor 120.  The SMS processor 120 forwards the call request             
          and short message to dispatch controller 103, which, in turn,               
          establishes communication links between itself and target devices           
          107 through 110 of the originating communication talk group as              
          described above.  Once the links are established, the dispatch              
          controller transmits the short message to target devices 107                
          through 110 via the SMS processor 120 and establishes the links             
          126 through 127, 129 through 130.  Thus, we find that Sanders               
          teaches simultaneously transmitting said short message to each of           
          the plurality of called subscriber numbers by designating said              
          group identifier, as recited in Appellant’s claim 1.  Therefore,            
          we have found that Sanders teaches all of the claimed elements              
          recited in Appellant’s claim 1.                                             
               Appellant further argues that the Examiner’s reasoning that            
          the ID of the communication device reads on the group identifier            
          defies logic.  Appellant argues that the ID of the communication            
                                          12                                          




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007