Appeal No. 2002-1006 Application 09/132,351 must set forth the authorities and arguments on which [A]ppellant will rely to maintain the appeal. Any arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused consideration by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, unless good cause is shown. Thus, 37 CFR § 1.192 provides that only the arguments made by Appellants in the brief will be considered and that failure to make an argument constitutes a waiver on that particular point. Support for this rule has been demonstrated by our reviewing court in In re Berger, 279 F.3d 975, 984, 61 USPQ2d 1523, 1528-29 (Fed. Cir. 2002), wherein the Federal Circuit Court stated that because the Appellant did not contest the merits of the rejections in his brief to the Federal Circuit Court, the issue is waived. Having addressed all the arguments, we therefore will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 2 through 8, 10, 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In view of the foregoing, we sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and we sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 2 through 8, 10, 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. 15Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007