Appeal No. 2002-1022 Application 09/326,934 in this patent of the use of “borders as images on the reels,” and the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Yamamoto will not be sustained. The last reference applied by the examiner under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) against claims 1, 3 and 5 is Howard. This patent discloses a reel structure for use in a physical reel slot machine game and includes a reel drum (Figs. 5 and 6) over which is applied a thin plastic reel-strip (e.g., Figs. 3 and 4) carrying a plurality of symbols (5) formed in relief, sunken regions (6) surrounding the symbols (5), and raised sections (4) and (7) surrounding the sunken regions (6). Note also, the reel- strip seen in Figure 7 of Howard. Like the examiner, it is our opinion that when either of the thin plastic reel-strips in Howard is applied over the reel drum and used in a gaming machine as described in column 1, lines 13-21 of that patent, the areas (e.g., (4), (6) and (7)) surrounding the symbols (5) will visually define “borders as images on the reels that surround the symbols . . .,” as set forth in appellants’ claim 1 on appeal. Again, we recognize appellants’ argument that a physical structure cannot be an image, however, appellants’ own disclosure regarding physical reel formats (specification, pages 12-14) belies that argument. Moreover, the physical reel drum seen in 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007