Appeal No. 2002-1022 Application 09/326,934 game/machine formats in either Barrie or Marnell II or Falciglia, to convert the physical reel slot machines as seen in either Andersen or Yamamoto or Howard to a virtual format so that they could be played on a video monitor wherein the reels as disclosed in any of Andersen or Yamamoto or Howard would appear as virtual reels displayed on a monitor. Appellants argument (brief, pages 19-21) again focuses on the physical nature of the structures in the primary references to Andersen, Yamamoto and Howard, and urges that there would be absolutely no functional benefits for creating an image in a video game of a physical reel element that served a functional purpose on a physical reel. We do not agree. Assuming it is the desire of an artisan to faithfully recreate the slot reel game of Andersen or Howard in a virtual reel format, we are convinced that it would have been obvious to such artisan to recreate the entire visual impression of the physical reel arrangement as seen in Andersen (Figs. 4-5) or Howard (Figs. 3 and 7), and thus provide the reels, the symbols, characters or alphanumerics, and the borders seen in such patents all as images produced on a video screen. Thereby, in our opinion, providing a virtual reel format wherein the total reel format image includes “borders as images on the reels.” While a physical structure may well have a functional purpose in a 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007