The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MICHAEL KERN and IRVIN BURNS _____________ Appeal No. 2002-1066 Application No. 09/304,021 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-8 and 19-27, all the claims currently pending in the application. Subsequent to the final rejection, the examiner objected to claims 2, 3, 21 and 25 as depending from rejected claims, but otherwise considered these claims to be allowable (answer, pages 3-4). Thus, the appeal now involves only claims 1, 4-8, 19, 20, 22-24, 26 and 27.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007