The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte THORSTEN BLUME, PETER ESPERLING, and JOACHIM KUHNKE ___________ Appeal No. 2002-1093 Application No. 09/288,691 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges. WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 16 through 18. Claims 1, 2, and 6, which are the only other claims remaining in the application, stand allowed. The Invention The invention relates to a process for preparing 4,4-dimethyl-5"-cholesta- 8,14,24-trien-3$-ol (FF-MAS). As stated in the specification, page 1, second paragraph, previous studies have shown that FF-MAS, isolated from human follicularPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007