Ex Parte BLUME et al - Page 1



                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                                                                                           Paper No. 21                

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                    __________                                                         

                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                    __________                                                         
                                           Ex parte THORSTEN BLUME,                                                    
                                             PETER ESPERLING, and                                                      
                                                 JOACHIM KUHNKE                                                        
                                                    ___________                                                        
                                               Appeal No. 2002-1093                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/288,691                                                
                                                    __________                                                         
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                    __________                                                         
             Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
             WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     
                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 16 through                    
             18.  Claims 1, 2, and 6, which are the only other claims remaining in the application,                    
             stand allowed.                                                                                            


                                                    The Invention                                                      
                     The invention relates to a process for preparing 4,4-dimethyl-5"-cholesta-                        
             8,14,24-trien-3$-ol (FF-MAS).  As stated in the specification, page 1, second                             
             paragraph, previous studies have shown that FF-MAS, isolated from human follicular                        






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007