Ex Parte BLUME et al - Page 3



                     Appeal No. 2002-1093                                                                                                             Page 3                            
                     Application No. 09/288,691                                                                                                                                         
                     11).  By the same token, claim 2 recites a multi-step process for preparing FF-MAS,                                                                                
                     including all of the steps illustrated in diagram 2 (specification, page 14).  The claims on                                                                       
                     appeal also recite a process for preparing FF-MAS.  Unlike claims 1 and 2, however,                                                                                
                     the claims on appeal do not positively recite a series of steps.  For example, claim 16 is                                                                         
                     a "comprising" type claim which positively recites a single step, viz., "isomerizing a                                                                             
                     compound of formula 6."                                                                                                                                            
                                Claim 16, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows:                                                                      





                     \                                                                                                                                                                  


























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007