Appeal No. 2002-1093 Page 6
Application No. 09/288,691
forth what applicants regard as their invention. Again, however, the examiner does not
rely on adequate reasons or evidence which would support her position but only on a
subjective belief that applicants' claims are incomplete. Again, that is not enough to
establish that claims 16 through 18 fail to comply with 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph.
The examiner's decision rejecting claims 16 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, is reversed.
REVERSED
)
Sherman D. Winters )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
William F. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
Toni R. Scheiner )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007