The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KAILASH C. GULATI
__________
Appeal No. 2002-1192
Application 09/256,383
___________
HEARD: February 4, 2003
___________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 4 through 6, 9, 10, 15 and 17 through 20, all
of the claims remaining in this application. Claims 1 through 3,
7, 8, 11 through 14 and 16 have been canceled.
As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant’s
invention relates to liquefied gas storage tanks and in
particular to a tank especially adapted for storing cryogenic
liquefied gas (e.g., liquefied natural gas (LNG)) at cryogenic
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007