Appeal No. 2002-1192 Application 09/256,383 In rejecting claims 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Lalvani, the examiner directs us to Figure 2 of the applied patent urging that Figure 2 shows an internal truss braced frame with a plurality of aligned vertical truss structures positioned transversely and longitudinally spaced. In addition, the examiner points to the Abstract of the Lalvani patent noting that it states that the truss frame can be combined with membrane systems and used in environmental structures. The examiner further urges that “[t]he intended use for retaining liquid does not further limit the claims over the structure of Lalvani” and that “[i]t is inherent that the membrane is secured to the outer frame” (answer, page 3). Concerning claim 18, the examiner again directs us to Figure 2 of Lalvani and urges that it shows at least one vertical truss structure positioned longitudinally within the internal truss frame and secured between two adjacent longitudinally spaced vertical trusses. The patent to Lalvani discloses a building system comprising a family of space frames (e.g., Fig. 2) based on classes of non- regular polyhedral nodes connected by appropriate struts (13 of Fig. 2), wherein the space frames can be converted into panel or plate systems, nodeless space frames, membrane and shell systems, 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007