Appeal No. 2002-1192
Application 09/256,383
In summary, we note that the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) has not been
sustained. In addition, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 4 through 6, 9, 10, 15 and 17 through 20 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) has not been sustained. Accordingly, the decision of the
examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:pgg
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007